Microsoft adds four metrics to its AI report in Bing Webmaster Tools on June 16, 2026: Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Compare. Here is what they measure, and what they leave in the dark.
And your brand, does ChatGPT recommend it?
Measure your presence and spot the brands cited in your place. No credit card.
Key takeaways
Bing now offers a free measure of your citation share in its AI answers, but that data covers only one ecosystem (Copilot and Bing): mistaking it for your global Share of Voice remains the trap to avoid.
What does the Bing Webmaster Tools update change in June 2026?
Microsoft enriches its AI Performance report with four features, rolled out in global preview on June 16, 2026. These additions build on the report launched in February 2026, which already showed where your content appears in answers generated by Copilot, Bing and select AI partners.
The logic stays the same. The report relies on grounding queries, meaning the queries and web material the system uses to support and source its answer. Until now, you could see which queries triggered a citation of your site. You now see the context, the theme, your relative share and the evolution over time.
Microsoft sums up the goal this way: helping publishers understand why their content is surfaced, which broad subject areas they are gaining visibility in, and how their presence evolves against other cited sources. The shift is clear. You move from a simple citation count to a reading of the context around those citations.
Intents, Topics, Citation Share, Compare: what does each feature measure?
Each metric answers a precise question. Here is the breakdown, one block per feature.
Intents: classifying the context of queries
The Intents feature classifies your grounding queries into broad categories: Informational, Commercial, Navigational, Learn and Solve, Research, Creation, Local, and more. You grasp the intent behind the query that triggered your citation. An e-commerce site may discover strong presence in comparison-oriented or shopping-focused AI experiences. An educational site will see its content surface mostly in research or learning contexts. This reading helps you align the structure and depth of your pages with the experiences where AI surfaces you.
Topics: grouping queries into thematic clusters
Topics groups related grounding queries into broad themes. AI systems reason by concepts, not isolated keywords. Queries such as “solar panels,” “solar energy efficiency,” or “residential solar installation” all map into a broader theme like Solar Energy. You analyze your visibility in the same thematic structure the models use to organize information. Microsoft warns, however, that during the preview phase some labels stay broad, especially in highly specialized domains.
Citation Share: your share of the citation space
Citation Share shows how much of the citation space your site captures on a given query. The calculation is simple: the percentage of citations attributed to your site out of all citations shown for that same grounding query. You no longer only know whether you are cited, but how much visibility you recover within the full set of cited sources. Microsoft stresses one point. According to the publisher, Citation Share is an observational metric
, not a ranking system or a competitive scoreboard. The data exposes no competitor domains and assigns no quality score to content.
Compare: tracking evolution over time
Compare overlays a past period onto the current reporting view. You compare, for example, the last 30 days against the previous 30, or custom ranges. The point: visually spotting the shifts that follow a content update, seasonality or a change in demand. Microsoft recalls that citation activity depends on many factors, including model evolution, content freshness and competing content.
| Feature | Question it answers | Data displayed |
|---|---|---|
| Intents | In what context am I cited? | Intent category (Informational, Commercial, Local…) |
| Topics | On which broad themes am I gaining visibility? | Thematic clusters grouping queries |
| Citation Share | What share of citations do I capture? | % of your citations out of a query’s total |
| Compare | How is my presence evolving? | Overlay of two periods |
Citation Share is not your AI Share of Voice: the nuance to understand
Citation Share measures a single ecosystem: Copilot, Bing and their partners. Your global Share of Voice plays out across all the generative engines your prospects actually use. Confusing the two distorts your reading.
The difference is methodological. Citation Share is first-party single-engine data: Microsoft measures its own perimeter, which makes it reliable but partial. A usable Share of Voice, in contrast, relies on multi-engine aggregation, calculated over 60 to 100 prompt runs, to smooth out the natural instability of AI answers. A brand strong in Copilot may stay absent from ChatGPT or Mistral. One window says nothing about the others.
The right reflex is to treat Citation Share as a cross-validation signal, not as your reference metric. If your share rises in Bing while your multi-engine Share of Voice also climbs, you hold a solid trend. If Bing rises alone, you hold a local signal to confirm elsewhere.
Should you really plug into Bing when your clients use ChatGPT?
The answer depends on your market, but the tool keeps real value. Microsoft Copilot relies on the Bing index, and that perimeter stays minority compared to ChatGPT in consumer usage. Many consultants therefore see Bing as a secondary source.
Underestimating this report would still be a mistake. It is the only free first-party data that tells you, from the source, how a generative engine actually cites you. No prompt simulation offers that certainty. For rigorous work, you gain from crossing three things: Bing’s raw data, your multi-engine tracking, and your analytics. Three angles, one reality to reconstruct.
Concretely, three profiles draw a clear benefit from the Bing report:
- Publishers and media, whose content is heavily reused as grounding and who quickly see their authority themes emerge.
- B2B and technical sites, overrepresented in Copilot through professional use of the Microsoft ecosystem.
- Agencies, who finally hold official proof to embed in a client deliverable, alongside their own measurements.
How to use Intents and Topics in your content strategy?
Intents and Topics turn a list of queries into a strategic map. Here is how to read them to decide, not just observe.
Step 1: spot your dominant intent. Look at which Intents category concentrates your citations. A strong presence in Commercial signals that AI mobilizes you on purchase queries. A presence in Research points to a documentary authority position. You adapt the depth and format of your pages accordingly.
Step 2: identify your authority themes. In Topics, spot the clusters where you already rank. These are your won terrains. Reinforce them with related content rather than scattering across topics where you are invisible.
Step 3: hunt thematic gaps. A theme relevant to your business, absent from your Topics, reveals a coverage hole. That is your next editorial target, validated by a real engine’s data.
Step 4: track evolution with Compare. After each content update, compare two periods. You measure the effect of your work on your citation share, without waiting for a traffic signal often invisible in GA4.
Bing vs Google Search Console: where does AI reporting stand in 2026?
Bing leads the AI reporting race in 2026. The engine launched its AI Performance report in February, four months before Google, which only rolled out its AI reporting in Search Console in June. Microsoft has been stacking features since, where Google arrived later on the subject.
A shared limit persists, however. Neither engine provides click data or click-through rate on AI citations. You see your presence and your citation share, never the traffic that directly follows. This absence weighs on attribution: AI visibility remains, to date, a leading indicator to correlate with your other sources, not a direct conversion metric.
For non-English markets, this race reads with perspective. Bing’s data is useful and free, but it does not replace monitoring covering ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Mistral. Engine reporting progresses fast. It does not yet replace an independent, multi-engine measurement.
FAQ
Is Bing Webmaster Tools free?
Yes. Bing Webmaster Tools is free, and the AI Performance report with its new Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Compare features is included, in global preview since June 16, 2026.
Does Citation Share show my competitors?
No. Microsoft describes Citation Share as an observational metric. It exposes no competitor domain, does not represent a traffic share and assigns no quality score to your content.
Does the Bing AI report cover ChatGPT?
No. The report measures citations in Copilot, Bing and select AI partners. It covers neither ChatGPT, nor Gemini, nor Claude, nor Mistral. For those engines, an independent multi-engine tracking remains necessary.
What is a grounding query?
In an AI-generated answer, grounding refers to the source material and web evidence the system uses to support and cite its answer. The grounding query is the query tied to that sourcing.
Did Bing beat Google on AI reporting?
On timing, yes. Bing launched its AI Performance report in February 2026, against June 2026 for Google Search Console’s AI reporting.
Can we know the traffic generated by AI citations?
Not yet. Neither Bing nor Google provides click data or click-through rate on AI citations. Visibility stays measurable; the direct traffic that follows is not, through these reports.
Sources
- Microsoft Bing Blogs, “New AI Visibility Insights in Bing Webmaster Tools: Intents, Topics, Citation Share, Compare”, Krishna Madhavan et al., June 16, 2026 — blogs.bing.com
- Search Engine Land, “Bing Webmaster Tools updates AI reporting with Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Compare”, Barry Schwartz, June 16, 2026 — searchengineland.com
